Compare AI models: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Hy4

Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Kimi K2.7 Code	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	34/100	63/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Hy4	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	55/100	92/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Moonshot

Tencent

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text, Image

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Moonshot

Tencent

Pricing

Input

$0.60/ 1M

$0.42/ 1M

Output

$3.50/ 1M

$1.25/ 1M

Cached input

$0.16/ 1M

$0.02/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

155K

5.8K

Completed sessions

595,957

23,605

Token share

0.1%

0.01%

Tokens

1.3T-34%

77B+100%

SEP 12NOV 6

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

56.9%13K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 CodeDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 CodeJamba Mini Related comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4Jamba Mini