Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5 Nano
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5 NanoOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 84/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| GPT-5 Nano | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 75/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.09/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$0.18/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.1M
7.4K
Completed sessions
17,144,953
56,134
Token share
3.9%
0%
Tokens
52T-82%
5B+15%
SEP 12NOV 6
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.3%88K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5 Nano vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5 Nano·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5 Nano vs Jamba MiniGPT-5 Nano·Jamba Mini